Wednesday 28 May 2014

How do you really value brands?

Why does a Durex condom seem to be the safest choice when it comes to protected sex? Why is Starbucks the first place that comes to mind when I ask my friend to meet for coffee? Why do so many people think Kleenex is an actual word when it is just a tissue brand?
                                         
I will tell you why… Brands have (magical) power: the power to make people think about them at the right place, at the right time. This is brand recognition / recall, and this is what any brand wants to achieve. It is the marketing holy grail.

My perception is: Brand is an intangible sphere made of a specific imagery, associations, name, sounds, smells and personas that give your brand an identity to differentiate your company, and to communicate and deliver a premium to your customers. 

This is why you cannot entirely measure brand value only by ranking them according to revenues, or market capitalisation index. 
Of course, the cash you make will speak for itself and will put your brand where it is supposed to be.
But is revenue the end goal? Or is it a mean to an end? According to some of the most famous agencies’ rankings, it is a defining dimension. Financial value is how WPP, for instance, assesses brands’ value and rank them.  
As I see it, it is a limited view, as now other aspects matter equally, such as social currencies. Your online share of voice (mentions of your brand &/or product relative to the rest of the industry mentions) sometimes are more impactful in consumers decision making process along their journey to purchase.

                       

So how can a brand enhance its value, other than by increasing profit?
CSR is, in my opinion, a slippery slope. It should not be seen as a Unique Selling Point as it is, nowadays, an almost normal criterion. You wouldn’t imagine Tesco not having a sustainable and social policy and guidelines along their business value proposition. So, to me, putting ethics and social responsibility on the front line is not strong enough to compete. It should be existent yes, but as a pillar, a benchmark to follow, for your business activities.

                        


What should matter to companies' eyes is the following: The truly ultimate ‘recognition’, when a consumer doesn’t need to recognise you. They just need a few hints to figure out it is your product. No more logo, no more slogan, no more music needed.  McDonalds is the most recent and brilliant example of that kind of achievement. Since last summer, McDonalds and their French agency, TBWA are playing the ‘no brand card.’ They are reasserting the leading position of our all time favorite junk food retail shop with just having close-up product shots and basic drawings on their menu (sic!).


Last but not least: a little reminder: you are not in control of your brand, your consumers are. Don’t be scared, it is better that way..! The more participation you get in, the more your brand is going to be valuable to your customers, and the more of them you will retain. Customers will help you help them get the best out of your brand, and this is what any brand should hope for.